Menu
Log in

Is this article worth my time?

Beta QUIT Tool (more content soon)

INFO
* Select applicable response
Abstract
1) Are the outcomes clinically relevant to you?
2) Does the study compare different groups?
Methods
3) Was a sample size calculation done?
   
4) Are study methods and all outcomes described sufficiently for you to understand what they did? (Tip: Were reporting guidelines followed?)
        
5) Did researchers control allocation of animals to groups AND which groups were treated?
        
6) Were animals randomly assigned to groups and the method of randomization described?
        
Results
7) Do authors report results for all outcomes?
        
8) Are key statistical data provided for reported outcomes?
Discussion
9) Are conclusions supported by the results?
10) Do authors discuss study limitations?
        
* “Yes” answers support investing more time to consider the paper thoroughly.
“No” answers indicate a characteristic associated with risk of bias is present.
This tool has not been validated.
Tool developed by JFM Web Design




Copyright © 2004-2025 by the Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine Association, all rights reserved.

The EBVMA (Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine Association) is an international non-profit [U.S. 501(c)3] professional organization founded to better organize the emerging research, training and practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM) — the formal strategy to integrate the best critically-designed and statistically evaluated research available combined with clinical expertise as well as the unique needs or wishes of each client in clinical practice.

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software